"The Jews are enemies of the Church" by Prof. Catholic John Lamont

What the Jews not the enemies of the Church ?(Excerpts) 06 March 2014 trialHomiletic and Pastoral Review (Journal of Catholic priests) http://www.hprweb.com/2014/03/why-the-jews-are-not-the-enemies-of-the-church/with responses by Michael Hoffmanauthor of discovered Judaism and most egregious claims of strange GodsLamont of Judaism are in bold, Hoffman responses in blue:Lamont: can briefly put the reason why rabbinical Jews are not enemies of the Church. Such Jews do not seek...prevent non-Jewish Christians in the exercise of his faith. They just refuse to become Christians themselves, which is not enough to make them "enemies" of the Church... _Hoffman: note your rating: not Jewish Christians are not prevented. Apparently he does not oppose the prohibition of "Jewish Christians".In addition, forbidden Christian missionary Evangelism is Judaic people in the State of Israel and the Talmud requires the destruction of the New Testament. Jewish groups across the spectrum from right to left oppose the kingship of Christ in the United States and Europe and are major forces in the dilution emasculation of Christianity in a drill without teeth and a complement of Zionism.In Ashkenazi Judaism Rabbi Moses Maimonides are the main authority in halacha (law). Maimonides rules that it is policy to do so and the Jews won't blame, then Christians are killed whenever possible. Maimonides says that Christianity is idolatry (worship of Jes?s of Nazareth as God). According to the laws of precepts of the Talmud, idolatry is death.Orthodox Judaism is implacably opposed to true Christianity. Hateful, ritual curse of Judaism on the Christians, which has echoed perpetually through the halls of time since at least the days of Rabbi Gamaliel, continues in our time. The relentless hostility to Orthodox Judaism is home to Western civilization, who curses him ritually as malkhut zadonsk can be discovered in the invocation of the synagogue of Birkat Ha'Minim as it is documented in the Bulletin No. 70, "The rabbinical curse Christians" revisionist history.
Lamont: statement by Paul in 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16: "because you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God which in Judea, in Christ Jesus." To suffer the same things of his countrymen as they did to the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets and chase them not pleasing to God and opposed to all over the world, trying to prevent that he speaks to the Gentiles that can be saved, therefore constantly filling the measure of their sins. But the wrath of God has finally begun to fall upon them. Ennemond argues that since this passage describes the Jews as enemies of all men, it follows that they are adversaries of the Church.
...These passages, however, do not can be understood as applying to all Jews. The term "adversary", which is used by Saint Paul, applies to Jews who were trying to prevent that early Christians preaching the Gospel to the Gentiles. It is this attempt to prevent the preaching of the Gospel that is Jews as "enemies" of all the men in the eyes of San Pablo, because they try to make the message of salvation to the rest of the human race. Since rabbinical Jews to make no effort to prevent the preaching of the Gospel to the Gentiles, and the founders of rabbinical Judaism lived some time after the death of Christ, these convictions cannot be applied to the.
Hoffman: notice that Paul is not limited solely to the burden of preventing Christians to preach the Gospel. He also claims that the Jews "killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets." Dr. Lamont repeats their nonsense on the rabbinical Jews not making any effort to prevent that the preaching of the Gospel. I have videos of harassed Christian missionaries and burned its headquarters in the State of Israel.Yo suggest that Lamont travel to Tel Aviv, stood in a corner of a large crucifix in hand, preach the true Gospel declares Jesus the true Messiah of the Jews and see what happens.
Lamont: for this reason there are very few references to Christ and Christianity in the Talmud, and the references that exist are short and inaccurate. They are disseminated scurrilous and abusive, but do not make any reference to the claims of Christ to the divinity or messianic StateHoffman: here the author shows abysmal ignorance. The Talmud says that Christ worshipped a brick and all wayward Israel; What does the Messiah? He also claims that he wished a housemaid, who was conceived when his whore Mother Mary menstruated during an adulterous appointment.  The Talmud also States that our Lord is in hell that it boiled in hot excrement. It is said that Jesus has his comeuppance when he was killed. _the assertion of Rabbinical Jews working to deny the doctrine of the divinity of Christ, therefore, is misleading. They deny themselves and try to stop the Jews accepting... _Hoffman: clear on this basis alone this makes them enemies of Christ and his Church. They deny that Jesus Christ is the Messiah and the son of God is the definition of the new testament of an Antichrist. Avoid millions of Jewish souls to receive Christ is Satanic. _additional falsehoods sold by John Lamont: regarding the claim that is a new religion, the first point to be made is both the Talmud is not religious in nature, but it is essentially a code of civil law that covers things such as inheritances, transaction comercialesy the criminal law. This code is justified by the claim that everything was received by Moisés de Dios on Mount Sinai. However, it is actually a legal code devised by the rabbis to provide a base for the Jewish community after the destruction of the Jewish State. It is a good legal code for the centuries of 2 to 5 standards, It was devised. For example, a form of research is different from the Roman law, which was encoded in the same period, which does not allow any role to torture in legal proceedings - Roman law made compulsory. As a legal code, the Talmud is largely a new development; But, it is not an inherently religious development. In religious matters, as noted above, the Talmud is an attempt to preserve the beliefs and practices of the scribes and Pharisees (this statement is true and which is an indictment of the Talmud - Hoffman) of the latter part of the era of the second temple (the era of 530 B.C. to A.D. 70, when the second temple Jewish was in existence).It contains some inaccuracies and expansions of these beliefs and practices, but it is not enough to constitute as a new religion Rabbinic JudaismIt is worth mentioning that the cabal is popular among Rabbinic Jews, which is a form of Gnosticism, which is not compatible with monotheism. It can thus rightly be described as a new religion which differs from the beliefs of the Jews before the time of Christ. However, it is a medieval development which does not form part of such Rabbinic Judaism. Readers may wish to consult Dr. Lamont article in its entirety instead of excerpts from Hoffman alone: http://www.hprweb.com/2014/03/why-the-jews-are-not-the-enemies-of-the-church/___Furthermore, in revisionist history Newsletter No. 70 Hoffman offers the latest documentation of measurement hitherto unknown of the judia-islamica Alliance in the middle ages and the fact that Orthodox Judaism does not consider Islam as negatively as the religion of Jesus Christ does.